What Makes Humans So Unique: the Social Science of Human Behavior

3 Comments
Join the Conversation
Human Beings: What is Truly Human About  Us - John Anderson
Human Beings: What is Truly Human About Us - John Anderson
Have you noticed that your dog often seems to have something to say? If only Lucy or Spike had the words necessary to express those thoughts to you.

Your dog probably has a great store of memories within her cerebral cortex, but she is unable to use them like you do because she lacks an ego, a consciousness of herself as an “I."

You began moving away from your dog’s world of symbols and illusions as an infant, when you began deconstructing images through your evolving intellect. Thanks to your ego, you began acquiring language to control the objects in your environment.

Words are social objects that one human learns from other humans in a long, complicated acquisition of language. For a word to become a social symbol, at least two humans must agree on its meaning. Otherwise, each person would simply talk to himself, using the kind of incomprehensible language babbled by some mental patients.

What an Animal Knows But Can’t Share

Your dog’s senses are highly developed, so she probably has an image in mind of a remembered event. In a recent study conducted by Alliston Reid and John Pilley at Wofford College, a female Border Collie named Chaser was able to learn the names of 1,022 objects over a period of three years, acquiring the vocabulary of the average three-year-old human. Unlike a human child, of course, Chaser could only manage to respond and interact with others through barks and cute head, tail, and paw motions.

An ape’s 450-cubic-centimetre brain is large enough to permit imaginary pictures of past events, which may in turn present a picture of potential events. This writer recalls a visit to the Bronx Zoo ape “house” when another visitor, grasping a shiny red apple, entered. The great ape turned to see the man with the apple and glanced nonchalantly away as the man tossed the apple to him. The ape backhanded the apple, glanced away again, and without warning hurled it with surprising accuracy and at great velocity at the man’s head like a pitcher throwing to first to catch the runner off guard.

When the ape saw the man approach with the apple, he may have recalled similar events. This memory helped him anticipate the apple toss and equipped him to “decide” to have some fun by throwing it back.

By reacting to his environment, the ape committed an acute social act. But an animal’s ability to react to such stimuli cannot take symbolic form until its reaction becomes a mutually shared venture. In the ape house, the reaction was shared with me, laughing, and the man with chunks of broken apple in his hair, frowning, but not with the other two apes in the cage. They paid no attention. Not a word was spoken.

The first real evidence of human extrinsic symbolization, Paleolithic cave art, is only 40,000-years-old; but shared activities such as fire building, tool-making, hunting and gathering indicate that humans were linking their reactions to other humans by means of extrinsic symbols from the moment they began walking the earth.

The Human Advantage of Slow Development

The pregnancy of a Rhesus monkey lasts for 166 days, while a human female’s goes on for 266. Mother Rhesus suckles her infant for a few weeks. A human baby requires her mother’s milk for one to two years. During that long time, the human baby is completely dependent upon the mother. Its huge head sits precariously on its tiny body. That great, cute head may appear to be too big, but it’s disguising the serious incubation of a large and complicated brain inside.

Human babies are made so different from animals by the slow development and helpless dependence on adults during a long, drawn-out infancy. With the great size of its brain, the human infant has a peculiar psychological sensitivity that enables her to react to her environment by controlling many different processes at once with complete freedom from direct stimulus. As information is fed into the slow developing control center we call a brain, she learns to build words, complete sentences, and to manipulate math formulas. No other animal has this power.

The “Ego” I and the “Id” Object

The ego exemplifies a large brained animal’s central control of behavior. Freud’s translator chose to use the Greek word “ego” for the German “ich,” or “I.” He also translated the German “es,” or “it,” as the Greek word “id.” In this way, the translator made an easy understanding of Freud unnecessarily difficult.

The ego, or "I," is the thought process, as in “I am hungry, so I will eat now.” The id, or "it," is a picture, a memory, a sensation. Animals like your dog are almost entirely “it," living in a world of timeless sensation, punctuated by a rewarding treat or, better yet, your affectionate praise, but without any central controlling "I".

Animals can only react, lacking the ego that controls reactivity. The human infant spends its slow, patient development building an ego, a sense of "I." With time, information, and attention, the infant’s ego creates time by giving her world of events a fixed point of self-reference.

The Human Voice Reveals How Humans are Unique

Your dog’s conscious life may be something like you experience in dreams and nightmares, which occur in sleep as your ego takes a much needed break, according to Freud’s theory of dreams. To relate herself to past, present, and future and to break down her hallucinatory store of memories, even the well trained Border Collie, Chaser, must fix herself in time with a precise designation of self and that requires the speech that she will never possess.

Dr. Ernest Becker, who believed that individuals' characters are essentially formed around the process of denying their own mortality, that this denial is necessary for us to function in the world and that this character-armor prevents genuine self-knowledge, put it this way in his book, The Birth and Death of Meaning: “Speech is not merely part of human behavior, or merely integral to it, or simply the most important aspect of it. Speech is everything that we call specifically human, because without speech there can be no true ego . . . The ego relates the world to itself so that it can control it. But the control resides in the ‘I,’ a linguistic point of self-reference.”

First Comes “Mine” and “Me,” and Only Then, “I”

Back when you were a child, your slow development -- so unique to humans -- gave you time to learn how to conceive of yourself in relation to your mother, when you were helplessly dependent upon her breast, and then to others you needed who surrounded you in a complex environment.

Once you began controlling that environment to get what you needed by crying and screaming, you began to acquire an ego and then you learned the personal pronoun “I," no matter what language was used in your personal environment. “I” became your “rallying point” for self-consciousness. All the events you encountered in the outside world began to converge on that center of awareness – your “I.” And you began to acquire words.

For most infants, that first word is “momma,” imitating the sound made while sucking and showing the dependence on mother and her breast. “I” is just a word too, and the baby’s primary ego already existed before she learned that word as it slowly developed a self-conscious awareness of her ego through that word.

Bolstered by your name, you began using the words “mine” and “me” and then "I" to take command of your world. Just as 007 introduced himself to strangers with an unmistakable point of reference (“Bond . . . James Bond”), so you make yourself known as a separate individual with your unambiguous name.

Who Are You?

Your “I” took form in relation to all those around you. If your dog had acquired a pronominal “I” in addition to the name you gave her, and if she identified each of the individual humans and animals in her world, her actions would no longer occur in a timeless world of emotions punctuated by sharp sensations (for example: who provides the food and drink, who could take it away).

Freud pointed out that the science of psychoanalysis was basically the study of an individual’s adaptation to his own slow development. Again: The human is a slowly developing animal with a large brain that becomes conscious of himself (his ego) as an object (his id).

Dr. Becker wrote, “He discovers his body as something in the outside world . . . Man is the only animal – in the universe, for all we know – who sees himself as an object.”

When you were a baby, your mother gave you a consciousness of “me.” Your power of “I” grew, slowly and gradually, out of the vital social union with a “not me” object (your mother’s breast) followed by your union with some transitional object (your blanket, doll, or Teddy bear).

This transition to a comforting way station “id” was your first step away from your omnipotent mother and toward your own powerful self. Eventually, you began to employ the vocal symbols learned from your parents in order to manipulate and control objects in your environment. First, of course, you had to learn to live with yourself – your own body -- as an object.

Sources:

  • Becker, Ernest, The Birth and Death of Meaning, A Perspective in Psychiatry and Anthropology, The Free Press of Glencoe, A Division of The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, 1962
  • Brown, Norman O., Life Against Death, The Psychoanalytic Meaning of History, Vintage Books, A Division of Random House, New York, NY, 1959
  • Storr, Anthony, Freud: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY, 1989
  • Pryor, Karen, Don’t Shoot the Dog! The New Art of Teaching and Training, Ringpress Books Ltd., Gloucestershire, UK, 2002
John Anderson takes a break from the keyboard., Julia Anderson

John Anderson - John Anderson has worked as a journalist, editor, advertising executive, Internet pioneer, and he has authored four books.

rss
Advertisement
Leave a comment

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
Submit
What is 4+5?

Comments

May 23, 2011 6:50 PM
Guest :
Great article! I'm going to try to find Dr. Becker's book, thanks to you.
May 24, 2011 10:22 AM
Guest :
It is important to point out that the ego is a central psychological sphere of the personality that is constructed to control responses. It's a force intended to delay behavior so as to make reactivity richer by providing many alternative actions. The helpless infant assumes the attitude of the mother, upon whom he is totally dependent for survival, toward himself. He adjusts his behavior to that attitude. Any threat of abandonment by his outside source of nutrition means death, annihilation. Therefore, the infant must eliminate anything in himself that could arouse hostility or rejection by the adult. He learns to please the adult. By banishing awareness of hostility to keep his environment friendly, he begins a life-long process of defending himself against anxiety. He only lets his guard down in sleep, when his ego is down. That is when anxiety intrudes as nightmares in a terrifying flood of chaos that the infant is powerless to combat or control. The ego's function is to delay response, to take over anxiety, to regulate it in small, manageable doses. To do so, the ego builds defenses against anxiety through such tools as denial, projection, repression, isolation. In other words, the ego develops neuroses to control primitive and learned anxiety. This development of the ego out of a mess of responses, the id, forms the basis of psychoanalysis. Anxiety is a function of object-loss, Freud taught. The only way an infant can know that he won't be abandoned is through constant contact and affection. The infant considers himself to be an object. The mother's milk without the unconditional, total love and affection of the mother herself establishes a basis for schizophrenia, the failure to manage anxiety. Humans have a unique ability by means of this cortical capacity to separate from immediate stimulus, which provides freedom from anxiety. But there's a high price to pay. Unlike lower animals, humans are forced to restrict their experience, beginning when the infant avoids actions that arouse the anxiety that his mother will abandon him. Freud explained it this way: the ego holds off anxiety "only by putting restrictions on its own organization." The infant thus begins his repressing lifelong struggle to win approval and, thereby, to restrict his own freedom.
May 24, 2011 1:20 PM
Guest :
A child learns "mine," "me," and "I" at about age two from his parents. Then as he begins setting limits to his own body boundaries, he discovers himself in relation to the objects that surround him in his environment. He is becoming a self-objectifying animal. To act in his environment, he has to bring something into it, unlike his cat whose behavior is completely governed by instinctual patters of behavior and, therefore, only needs to act. The contributor above was right about the need to live free of anxiety. To do so, the self-conscious human child must choose the "right" things to do as opposed to the "wrong" things. In this way, his life becomes meaningful and moral. Becker wrote that ". . . the self-reflexive animal's prescription for self-conscious action provides one thing truly new: the possibility of choice."

What happens when the mother frustrates an infant's desperate need for her milk and love? I seem to recall that back in 1962, when Becker and Brown were writing, autism was thought to result from a mother's withholding affection and attention from the frustrated, anxious infant. Do we still believe that this disorder to brought about by this early rejection? If the infant cannot find actions or words to control this anxiety-producing behavior by the object, the id, so vital to his survival, does the infant simply shut down?
3 Comments
Advertisement
Advertisement